Re:Intel discontinues Joule, Galileo, and Edison product lines
by baq on Monday June 19, 2017 @04:44PM
(#14590306)
of course it is. just saying that they could if they wanted.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Intel discontinues Joule, Galileo, and Edison product lines
by seanp2k2 on Monday June 19, 2017 @10:09PM
(#14591745)
Could they, though? If all the dozens or so people who could really drive a new big ARM project are at Apple, Samsung, Qualcomm, and NVidia, they might struggle to assemble a team that could make the needed breakthroughs to differentiate it. They also don't seem to have much interest from a business standpoint, preferring instead to sell $2k+ Xeons all day...and I hope EPYC gives them a real competitor.
Re:Intel discontinues Joule, Galileo, and Edison product lines
by andreiw on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @10:19PM
(#14600189)
Intel manufacured 32-bit ARMv5 chips via a unit originally acquired from DEC in '97. It was sold to Marvell 10 years ago. It's hard to see how any of this would help Intel create competitive ARMv8 server-class chips, but you're right, given their market hold of their x86 chips they clearly have the means to do it. However it would probably take a significant amount of time, and they would have real
competition. Sadly, I don't think they'll be investing into server-class 64-bit ARMv8 chips, and that's a mistake. CPUs are a commodity now, and the architecture wars are largely irrelevant with a heavy push towards OSS stacks. It's a race to the bottom, and ARM chips are going to be simpler for the same amount of performance, and that means ultimately cheaper.
Re:Intel discontinues Joule, Galileo, and Edison product lines
by abritinthebay on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @04:21PM
(#14598249)
I think, based on their past, that's a very optimistic "could".
I see no reason to believe that they could do so, organizationally, even if there was a desire to.