News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Debian 9 Stretch released by Tharre on Sunday June 18, 2017 @08:59AM (#14580452)
Not OP, but mostly in the same boat, except I still use Debian for my servers.

My biggest gripe with debian is apt. Compared to pacman, it is just so much worse in just about everything. I realize that it has a slightly more difficult job, but still.

I have found myself too often in situations, where I simply couldn't fix whatever apt was complaining about. With pacman you just specify -d and you're fine (or --force if there's a file conflict).

Also, I've never managed to successfully create my own debian package. With Arch PKGBUILD system, it's a breeze.

Just my 2 cents.

Re:Debian 9 Stretch released by krzyk on Sunday June 18, 2017 @10:23AM (#14580749)
Could you be more specific?

I use apt and it works fine for me (I can't say the same about yum on Redhats).

Re:Debian 9 Stretch released by jameskegel on Sunday June 18, 2017 @01:31PM (#14581782)
I'm not sure what you mean, could you give some examples?
Re:Debian 9 Stretch released by Tharre on Sunday June 18, 2017 @02:16PM (#14581999)
It's hard to be very specific here - since I obviously don't remember the exact problems I have encountered.

However here are two examples[0][1] of the sort of problems I mean. Both are non-issues with pacman, I can simply choose to ignore dependencies entirely and fix the problem.

Also I just realized I wrote "apt" before, but I really meant the packaging system itself, not just apt. Which also begs the question, why are there at least 4 seperate programs for package management (apt, apt-get, aptitude, dpkg)?

[0] https://askubuntu.com/questions/612593/

[1] https://askubuntu.com/questions/223237/