News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tanzania bans newspaper for 2 years by gumby on Saturday June 17, 2017 @02:32PM (#14577068)
I think the singular use of "newspaper" here follows convention in not needing a leading article ("a").

(Had it been plural the article would have also not been needed on a grammatical basis, although I think it would in that case have been fair to specify "some" or "all").

Re:Tanzania bans newspaper for 2 years by paulddraper on Saturday June 17, 2017 @03:48PM (#14577419)
Lacking a definite article is incorrect and worse, confusing.

"Tanzania bans fruit for two years"

"Tanzania bans song for two years"

Re:Tanzania bans newspaper for 2 years by jlg23 on Saturday June 17, 2017 @04:12PM (#14577521)
No confusion

The first can mean all fruit is banned, because "fruit" is a mass noun and as such does not have a plural form.

The second clearly refers to one song, just like the headline refers to one newspaper.

Re:Tanzania bans newspaper for 2 years by idle_processor on Saturday June 17, 2017 @04:59PM (#14577728)
"Song" can also refer to the act of singing, so the second one still read ambiguously to me.
Re:Tanzania bans newspaper for 2 years by zeroer on Saturday June 17, 2017 @04:22PM (#14577571)
The rules for newspaper headlines is not the same as for normal sentences.

> "Tanzania bans song for two years"

That's ungrammatical as a sentence but a perfectly good headline.

Re:Tanzania bans newspaper for 2 years by qbrass on Saturday June 17, 2017 @06:36PM (#14578039)
It's not ungrammatical. You're just expecting a different usage of the word song, so it looks wrong.

Had it been "Tanzania bans song and dance for two years," you wouldn't have batted an eye.

Re:Tanzania bans newspaper for 2 years by zeroer on Saturday June 17, 2017 @06:56PM (#14578094)
Wow, you're right. I missed that interpretation.