For what it's worth I don't think saturated fat is necessarily bad. I don't have links but I've read a couple of good studies that showed saturated fat raised LDL in a cohort of sedentary participants, but had no impact on LDL in a cohort of regular exercisers. This suggests it may be more important to focus on exercise if you're worried about HDL/LDL.
E.g. Eli Lilly's Evacetrapib: tested on 20k patients over 24 months, LDL down 30%, HDL up 125% - but zero difference in cardiovascular health outcomes. Needless to say it failed the trial and has been scrapped.
http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2017/05/18/now...
Eating fresh raw meat you actually do consume copious sugars in the form of the raw glycogen stores of the now dead animal.
>For instance, when blubber is analyzed by direct carbohydrate measurements, it has been shown to contain as much as 8—30% carbohydrates https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inuit_cuisine#Nutrition
But, I bet there is a world of difference to how our bodies process dietary glycogen and plant-sourced carbohydrates.
Reference: http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/07/magazine/what-if-it-s-all-...
Best analogy I've heard is "Gee whiz, everytime I see a fire, I see firemen. I guess firemen cause fires". Cholesterol does not cause heart disease all by itself.
You'd think scientists and the media, by this time, would have stopped relying on Dr. Ansel Keyes for their rationale for what causes heart disease. His 1950's "Seven Countries" study was an example of cherry-picked data to support a pre-determined outcome that was desired.
Reference: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/apr/07/the-sugar-co...
Finally, I can show you cultures, such as the Inuit, who's diet is almost exclusively saturated fat and protein and which are healthy (as long as they stick to their native diet). I challenge anyone to show me a culture who's diet is primarily sugar-based which has comparable health.
Reference: http://www.theiflife.com/the-inuit-paradox-high-fat-lower-he...