News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How we got 1,500 GitHub stars by mixing time-tested techn... by Retr0spectrum on Friday June 16, 2017 @09:49AM (#14568912)
Apparently, around $325 for 1500 stars: hxxp://githubstars.com/
Re:How we got 1,500 GitHub stars by mixing time-tested techn... by c8g on Friday June 16, 2017 @10:24AM (#14569249)
http://githubstars.com this a really helpful site. curl project got 5k stars from it :p
Re:How we got 1,500 GitHub stars by mixing time-tested techn... by yorwba on Friday June 16, 2017 @10:39AM (#14569395)
I believe your parent comment censored censored the link to avoid boosting the site's page rank. You may want to edit your comment (or not).
Re:How we got 1,500 GitHub stars by mixing time-tested techn... by nfriedly on Friday June 16, 2017 @11:24AM (#14569781)
FWIW, it looks like HN now adds rel="nofollow" to links in comments. So, it shouldn't matter either way.
Re:How we got 1,500 GitHub stars by mixing time-tested techn... by spraak on Friday June 16, 2017 @10:49AM (#14569482)
Can you explain what that means/what happens?
Re:How we got 1,500 GitHub stars by mixing time-tested techn... by nerdponx on Friday June 16, 2017 @10:57AM (#14569550)
Search engines rank sites (in part) according to the number of other sites that link to them. Wikipedia is ranked very highly in Google largely because many, many sites link to Wikipedia.

The PageRank algorithm to compute these kinds of rankings was one of Google's early innovations, and was the secret to its initial dominance over the early-2000s search engine market.

Re:How we got 1,500 GitHub stars by mixing time-tested techn... by colinbartlett on Friday June 16, 2017 @11:04AM (#14569613)
But the links all have rel="nofollow"
Re:How we got 1,500 GitHub stars by mixing time-tested techn... by c8g on Saturday June 17, 2017 @11:01AM (#14576168)
confused. it is just a funny website.