News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How female elk adjust behaviour with age to avoid hunters by 13of40 on Thursday June 15, 2017 @07:48PM (#14565455)
I'm not sure about elk, but deer tend to have an alpha male that mates with multiple females, so shooting a buck doesn't damage the population as much. I think that's why antelope hunting is gender-agnostic and you need to win a lottery to do it: They're monogamous, so killing a male has the same impact on the population as killing a female.
Re:How female elk adjust behaviour with age to avoid hunters by thaumasiotes on Thursday June 15, 2017 @09:43PM (#14566026)
It seems a lot more likely that killing males would discourage them from being monogamous than that killing males would have the same population impact as killing females.
Re:How female elk adjust behaviour with age to avoid hunters by Mz on Thursday June 15, 2017 @09:46PM (#14566041)
If you assume that they adapt the way human cultures do to such influences, which isn't necessarily true of animal populations.
Re:How female elk adjust behaviour with age to avoid hunters by thaumasiotes on Friday June 16, 2017 @12:54AM (#14566757)
The only things you need to assume are that they're alive and their mode of reproduction is obligately sexual. As far as the prediction is concerned, humans are totally irrelevant.
Re:How female elk adjust behaviour with age to avoid hunters by wbl on Thursday June 15, 2017 @11:50PM (#14566551)
Evolutionary pressure is a harsh mistress.
Re:How female elk adjust behaviour with age to avoid hunters by IndrekR on Friday June 16, 2017 @03:32AM (#14567238)
I am not sure how well Heinlein's polyandrous Loonies[1] would match real-life scenarios. This did not happen in New South Wales where male convicts outnumbered the female convicts six to one[2].

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Moon_Is_a_Harsh_Mistress [2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convict_women_in_Australia

Re:How female elk adjust behaviour with age to avoid hunters by thaumasiotes on Friday June 16, 2017 @10:33AM (#14569349)
Males and females are not symmetrical. A female who never reproduces because she wants to be faithful to a mate who doesn't exist is giving up 100% of her reproduction. A female who stays faithful to a mate who does exist is giving up 0%, in terms of quantity -- one mate can provide all the children a female is capable of having.