News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pistol sights by maxerickson on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @12:10PM (#14545855)
From several feet? While the sapling runs away?

I'm also not real sure what your point is. I said I wouldn't want to face someone wielding a machete anymore than. I was acknowledging that a malicious person can be plenty dangerous with weapons that basically can't be restricted (a machete can be improvised much more easily than a repeating firearm or ammunition for said firearm).

Re:Pistol sights by mirimir on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @12:21PM (#14545945)
No, saplings don't run away. But sometimes people don't either, especially when they're getting ready to shoot.

We agree that both machetes and guns are dangerous. But I'm arguing that a machete can be more dangerous than a handgun, in the hands of a trained attacker.

I was quibbling with the "physically work quite a bit" aspect of your comment.

Re:Pistol sights by upvotinglurker on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @12:54PM (#14546278)
My workplace provided "active shooter training" in which a police officer demonstrated a potential way for a group of unarmed people to disarm a person with a gun. When one of my coworkers asked "What if they have a knife?" the officer replied with something to the effect of "There's no good way to disarm them without getting your hands cut up, I'd much rather face an assailant with a gun than a knife."
Re:Pistol sights by vetinari on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @01:01PM (#14546352)
Cold weapons _are_ more dangerous at near distances, than guns.

The gun has exactly one business end and you know how it is going to be used. An attacker wielding a knife can use multitude of moves, how to attack.

Re:Pistol sights by MrFantastic on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @02:29PM (#14547294)
Shooting someone that is running away is murder not self-defense.
Re:Pistol sights by maxerickson on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @03:31PM (#14547851)
Yes, the context of the discussion is the malicious use of weapons.
Re:Pistol sights by mirimir on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @04:30PM (#14548347)
I have no argument with that.