News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Windows93 SP2.

Re:Windows93 SP2 by ahacker15 on Sunday June 11, 2017 @02:41PM (#14533130)
Awesome that this even work well on mobile browsers!

Is this open source? So we could see how it was made?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Windows93 SP2 by kowdermeister on Sunday June 11, 2017 @03:20PM (#14533317)
Sort of :) Explore the "c drive" to learn about the libs. I couldn't find an uncompressed version of the main code, but in the Chrome devtools most scripts are uncompresed.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Windows93 SP2 by blntechie on Sunday June 11, 2017 @05:23PM (#14533855)
Amazing that this was built in HTML/JS/CSS.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Windows93 SP2 by noway421 on Sunday June 11, 2017 @09:15PM (#14534705)
Terrifying one might say
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Windows93 SP2 by josteink on Monday June 12, 2017 @05:53AM (#14536094)
Well. It's still certainly easier than writing it from scratch, or through C/C++ and Windows GDI APIs.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Windows93 SP2 by Asraelite on Monday June 12, 2017 @10:40AM (#14537707)
One thing I can't figure out is how they implemented shaders in the FX program with the whole thing being rendered on the DOM instead of a canvas.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Windows93 SP2 by revolly on Monday June 12, 2017 @06:10PM (#14541526)
It's CSS SVG filters. Hilarious :-D
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Windows93 SP2 by msq on Sunday June 11, 2017 @04:18PM (#14533565)
Open credits.txt on the desktop.
[ Parent | on HN ]