News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Please Make Google AMP Optional by endorphone on Saturday June 10, 2017 @07:17PM (#14529756)
but Apple isn't commandeering the content itself like Google is

Content authors voluntarily publish their content in AMP form, so it doesn't seem fair to say that they commandeer anything: AMP is a subset of HTML intended for a fast mobile experience, and if you decide to take part you publish flags allowing Google to cache it. Google isn't unilaterally converting content to AMP.

The core argument against AMP primarily seems to be a fear that users will actually prefer AMP content. Which is ultimately rather anti-user.

Re:Please Make Google AMP Optional by ricardobeat on Saturday June 10, 2017 @08:36PM (#14530009)
> The core argument against AMP primarily seems to be a fear that users will actually prefer AMP content

How on earth did you arrive to that conclusion?

Re:Please Make Google AMP Optional by johnsmith21006 on Sunday June 11, 2017 @01:21PM (#14532787)
Exactly and thanks for pointing out. What matters most is the user and user experience, It is NOT about Google or Apple. Posts like they are the #2 corp or whatever is not relevant.