News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Please Make Google AMP Optional by bo1024 on Saturday June 10, 2017 @06:23PM (#14529527)
> If Google blacklisted non-AMP content, sure there's an argument, but as of yet this notion that it's some content theft is quite strange.

Doesn't Google already admit to prioritising AMP pages in search results?

Re:Please Make Google AMP Optional by tyingq on Saturday June 10, 2017 @06:27PM (#14529546)
They do. They seem to be a little quiet about the idea that a right/left swipe on your content switches to a competitors page though.
Re:Please Make Google AMP Optional by yoz-y on Sunday June 11, 2017 @04:36AM (#14531243)
It seems to be switching to the next article on the carousel. Which, at least for me completely breaks the web experience. Opening an amp page from google requires getting used to a whole new set of, in my opinion, unnecessary conventions.
Re:Please Make Google AMP Optional by qrbLPHiKpiux on Sunday June 11, 2017 @08:39AM (#14531738)
I can't think of another search engine alternative - a truly objective one. It used to be Google. Then they gained a tremendous amount of market share. Even an English language verb - googled. Now it's them. And I ask, now what?
Re:Please Make Google AMP Optional by paulhebert on Sunday June 11, 2017 @01:53PM (#14532937)
Try out DuckDuckGo (https://duckduckgo.com/). I've been using it for a few years and love it. They don't track you. They don't store your info. Plus, as far as I know they don't do anything besides search so they have no reason to not be objective.
Re:Please Make Google AMP Optional by diydsp on Sunday June 11, 2017 @04:59PM (#14533756)
I use DDG on all my devices at home and work. This whole thread has been a learning experience to me, because I never experience the various problems people have been reporting with AMP.

Perhaps my results could have been loading faster? I'm not willing to make a deal with the devil to find out. I'm pretty satisfied with what I have now.

Re:Please Make Google AMP Optional by endorphone on Saturday June 10, 2017 @06:24PM (#14529536)
Thus far it is purportedly not a ranking factor.

https://moz.com/blog/google-amp-search-results https://searchenginewatch.com/2016/07/06/is-google-amp-a-ran...

[just to be clear, just because you read it in some HN thread doesn't make it true. Let's see a single citation that it actually influences ranking]

Re:Please Make Google AMP Optional by untog on Sunday June 11, 2017 @01:15AM (#14530740)
I'm yet to see a single page in the carousel at the top of a search page not be an AMP page.
Re:Please Make Google AMP Optional by espadrine on Sunday June 11, 2017 @04:35AM (#14531237)
To be precise, it is not explicitly boosted in the rankings. One factor that Google Search takes into account is page load time.

https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-i...

There was a vicious spiral at work related to advertisers not caring enough about page load, and adding that signal was not enough. AMP shifted the game by placing the burden on Google of specifying a way to hit advertisers' goals while offering a faster experience.

Re:Please Make Google AMP Optional by untog on Sunday June 11, 2017 @05:28PM (#14533882)
> To be precise, it is not explicitly boosted in the rankings. One factor that Google Search takes into account is page load time.

And AMP pages are hosted on a Google CDN. They are very clearly putting their thumb on the scale.

Re:Please Make Google AMP Optional by tyingq on Saturday June 10, 2017 @06:28PM (#14529549)
In the organic results or the carousel?