News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intelligent Tracking Prevention by Arnt on Thursday June 08, 2017 @04:38AM (#14512804)
You can, but are you better than the classifier at actually doing? Have you done it for every web site you visited today?

Besides, there is some value in getting widespread blocking. When you're the only one who blocks, that's a signal. When Apple's new doodah blocks mostly-the-right-thing for 10% of the users, that's quite different. You get to be part of a crowd.

Re:Intelligent Tracking Prevention by a_imho on Thursday June 08, 2017 @05:18AM (#14512939)
I would think so, yes, mainly because I don't have to take advertisers into consideration. And I can do a lot more for my browsing experience blocking wise, much much more.

Invalidation is hard. Once you accept you have to tread down the road of accepting and deleting cookies and local storage I see no reason to wait 30 days. Why not purge them right on (tab)closing?. If you really care about privacy that is. Which could have been set to be default on the next update btw.

Re:Intelligent Tracking Prevention by ams6110 on Thursday June 08, 2017 @08:19AM (#14513587)
My browsers are set to purge all cookies upon exit. And I typically exit at least daily.
Re:Intelligent Tracking Prevention by Arnt on Thursday June 08, 2017 @11:49AM (#14515012)
Then you log in to HN again, which enables HN to tie your new cookie to your old cookies and tell all its advertising and tracking partners.

HN has no such partners, of course. But many other sites do, and correlate cookies in order to tie devices together.