Absolutely. People who don’t understand that an interview isn’t the same as a chat between buddies at the pub make terrible interviewers.
An interviewer’s job is to let the interviewee speak to the audience, even though the audience doesn’t get to directly ask questions.
In general nobody cares what the interviewer thinks, and we don’t want to hear them blab about themselves.
(This makes many “podcasts” unlistenable.)
In the context of interviewer<-->interviewee, though, I think it is generally more interesting to listen to the interviewee than the interviewer. It seems to me that the whole premise of the interviewer<-->interviewee is for the interviewer to get the interviewee to talk.