Re:List of Printers Which Do or Do Not Display Tracking Dots
by RegW on Wednesday June 07, 2017 @07:27AM
(#14505308)
I suppose the approach is to create a machine learning dataset that maps hi-res scans of sample documents to the printers that produced them. If the resulting classifier can accurately id the printer, you have probably found a watermark, but it might just be natural variations in the manufacturing.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:List of Printers Which Do or Do Not Display Tracking Dots
by Paul-ish on Wednesday June 07, 2017 @01:10PM
(#14508048)
The difficulty in this approach is that you have an extremely large number of classes. Each printer is its own class. Typically, as the number of classes goes up, accuracy goes done. That isn't to say it isn't possible, but it would require a lot of custom hacks to any learning algorithm.
Also to convince anyone that it works, you would need to test it out on an extremely large number of printers, including ones of the same model. In practice that could be expensive.
Re:List of Printers Which Do or Do Not Display Tracking Dots
by kpil on Wednesday June 07, 2017 @01:33PM
(#14508255)
Nah, it's not feasible to know the printer model if you want to identify a laserprinted dollar.
A few variants at most.
Re:List of Printers Which Do or Do Not Display Tracking Dots
by Heliosmaster on Wednesday June 07, 2017 @08:02AM
(#14505531)
still, if the result is a "fingerprint" of a printer, it'd be interesting to know, because it can be used by law enforcement too