News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Comparing Bandwidth Costs of Amazon, Google and Microsoft... by jfoutz on Monday June 05, 2017 @09:36PM (#14494037)
Totally, the thing that's super cool about the amazon instances you don't have to do anything with users, authentication, authorization, networking, dns, backups, monitoring, logging, firewall rules, security patches and upgrades.

With a bare metal server you have to manage all of that.

Re:Comparing Bandwidth Costs of Amazon, Google and Microsoft... by late2part on Tuesday June 06, 2017 @01:31AM (#14494975)
Oh my goodness man, have you managed Amazon instances? Setting up VPCs, IGW, IAM, DNS, EBS Snapshots (and deletions until recent lifecycle), custom metric in coudwatch, and Security Groups is a seriously challenging task just to learn the basics, much less do it right, much less automate it.

It's not a bed of roses in the physical world either, but you're simply wrong to say it's easy in the "Cloud" and hard in a DC/Bare Metal.

Re:Comparing Bandwidth Costs of Amazon, Google and Microsoft... by jfoutz on Tuesday June 06, 2017 @04:43AM (#14495715)
(it was a joke.) There are a zillion things to think about if you're going to have even one machine public on the internet, regardless of the hosting solution. At a small organization there's always that one programmer that's like half sysadmin.

I find it amusing that people pretend without bare metal, you'll get all of that person's time back.

Re:Comparing Bandwidth Costs of Amazon, Google and Microsoft... by late2part on Tuesday June 06, 2017 @07:37PM (#14502486)
I missed it. Thanks.