Re:Comparing Bandwidth Costs of Amazon, Google and Microsoft...
by baudehlo on Monday June 05, 2017 @08:59PM
(#14493864)
Well you're not comparing to AWS without ops, you're comparing to hiring someone for non-AWS vs managing AWS on your own. Outsourced ops know your systems. They have contracted guarantees. They can manage your own systems, hosted systems or even AWS. Using not-AWS saves you enough to pay for that.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Comparing Bandwidth Costs of Amazon, Google and Microsoft...
by jason_pomerleau on Monday June 05, 2017 @09:29PM
(#14494016)
> Outsourced ops know your systems.
I worked for a MSP for many years, and was well acquainted with our regional competitors. Our uptime and theirs was nowhere near AWS-level.
You're getting a different engineer every time you pick up the phone. They most certainly do not know your systems like an internal team would. I regularly saw cascading/circular issues caused by lack of familiarity and/or poor change management.
Owning and administering your own iron makes sense at a certain scale, but it's a much bigger scale than most companies will reach.