Re:The Argument Against Terraforming Mars (2016)
by Houshalter on Sunday June 04, 2017 @12:12PM
(#14482198)
I don't think most terraforming plans are remotely practical. One sort of compromise solution involves building an enormous ceiling and walls of glass over areas we want to inhabit. It could hold in heat and an atmosphere and would require much less effort to fill than the entire planet. Eventually the entire planet could be covered, but we could leave regions untouched as "nature" preserves.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Argument Against Terraforming Mars (2016)
by phyzome on Sunday June 04, 2017 @12:22PM
(#14482231)
I mean, if we can't even control the climate or live self-sufficiently in the deep desert on Earth, why the crap are we even talking about this stuff?
Re:The Argument Against Terraforming Mars (2016)
by SubiculumCode on Sunday June 04, 2017 @12:54PM
(#14482355)
Makes terrorists too powerful, everyone living under one dome.
Re:The Argument Against Terraforming Mars (2016)
by Houshalter on Sunday June 04, 2017 @01:10PM
(#14482414)
Perhaps every square mile could be walled off separately so if one area fails the others would be ok.
Re:The Argument Against Terraforming Mars (2016)
by SubiculumCode on Sunday June 04, 2017 @04:13PM
(#14483260)
Yeah. Even without maliciousness, it would be good to have airlocked subsections.