News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We plan to have Chrome hide ads that do not comply with t... by rm999 on Friday June 02, 2017 @10:31PM (#14474677)
>Plus, these experiences were shitty for the user but they must have worked

I spent years as a data scientist in the online display advertising space, and I was shocked at how much of a disconnect there was between advertiser ROI and clicks/impressions/whatever metric is being sold to the advertiser. There are very few parties whose best interests involved clearing up that connection. I heard one story of an ad executive getting fired for introducing A/B testing to their advertisers and proving the negative ROI.

Big flashy ads certainly improve clicks, but it's not clear if they make a customer want to buy a product.

Re:We plan to have Chrome hide ads that do not comply with t... by orangecat on Friday June 02, 2017 @11:45PM (#14474909)
Discussion at my office a few years ago about the economics of an ad-related service:

Me: "...and of course the advertisers will want to minimize the price they pay per ad..."

PM: "You'd be surprised"

Apparently marketing departments are often in situations where spending their entire budget is more important than getting views or conversions (so they can request a bigger budget next quarter), and they'll be annoyed if an ad broker spends less than they wanted even if they got more and better impressions.

Re:We plan to have Chrome hide ads that do not comply with t... by dboreham on Friday June 02, 2017 @11:02PM (#14474785)
Short version: advertising is BS