News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Oh My Gosh, It’s Covered in Rule 30s by Radim on Friday June 02, 2017 @02:14AM (#14467852)
Wolfram reminds me of Richard Feynman, in that sense.

The first time I tried to read "Surely You're Joking" as a kid I had to put it down -- the incessant "ME! ME! ME!" dripping from every page was a little too much.

I've since mellowed down and can read Feynman or Wolfram without any issues. I even enjoy that style now :-)

Re:Oh My Gosh, It’s Covered in Rule 30s by dean177 on Friday June 02, 2017 @03:14AM (#14468076)
What were you expecting from a biography?
Re:Oh My Gosh, It’s Covered in Rule 30s by dickbasedregex on Friday June 02, 2017 @08:52AM (#14469459)
Some humility mixed in with his bragging? Seems like a fair ask.
Re:Oh My Gosh, It’s Covered in Rule 30s by emmelaich on Friday June 02, 2017 @04:24AM (#14468366)
You're not the only one, Murray Gell-Mann regarded Feynman as self-aggrandising.

I still liked "Surely You're Joking" though. A lot, even though I've come to regard Feynman as somewhat flawed.

Re:Oh My Gosh, It’s Covered in Rule 30s by pocketsquare2 on Friday June 02, 2017 @02:56AM (#14468007)
The first time I tried to read a Feynman Diagram as a kid I had to put it down -- the incessant "ME! ME! ME!" dripping from every subatomic particle was a little too much.
Re:Oh My Gosh, It’s Covered in Rule 30s by mmjaa on Friday June 02, 2017 @03:52AM (#14468243)
Okay now you're just being contrary. Everyone knows that subatomic particles are all, like, "YOU! YOU! YOU!" ..
Re:Oh My Gosh, It’s Covered in Rule 30s by hyperpallium on Friday June 02, 2017 @02:46AM (#14467967)
4/3 I's per paragraph