Re:Why It Was Easier to Be Skinny in the 1980s
by planteen on Wednesday May 31, 2017 @07:48PM
(#14456822)
100 lbs is useless without height. So you wouldn't consider a 6' 3" person weighing 130 lbs skinny? I think the usual definition would be underweight (or near the low side of underweight) in a BMI sense.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why It Was Easier to Be Skinny in the 1980s
by kmdmsmkdmksd on Thursday June 01, 2017 @12:18AM
(#14457973)
5' 7"