> The author had a pretty tough job in trying to explain some of what's going on to a lay audience and (likely) do it inside a word limit.
The author would have had an easier time staying within a word limit if they didn't say the same thing multiple times in a row everywhere. Honestly, it looks like they had exactly the opposite problem of what you're suggesting and were trying to fill more space without understanding the subject. Much of the article is just parroting redundant PR soundbites.
The author would have had an easier time staying within a word limit if they didn't say the same thing multiple times in a row everywhere. Honestly, it looks like they had exactly the opposite problem of what you're suggesting and were trying to fill more space without understanding the subject. Much of the article is just parroting redundant PR soundbites.