Re:Interleaving and varying your study location are good lea...
by klodolph on Wednesday May 31, 2017 @01:45PM
(#14454441)
I think the claim as written is dubious, but the point is that our capacity to store information far exceeds our ability to recall information, and we can effectively recall things only because we forget so much.
There are a few people with a condition called hyperthymesia, like Jill Price, and the condition generally has a profound negative impact on their lives.
Re:Interleaving and varying your study location are good lea...
by mentos on Wednesday May 31, 2017 @03:39PM
(#14455280)
..and I wonder for people affected by hyperthymesia if they have memories of remembering a memory
Re:Interleaving and varying your study location are good lea...
by redipyni on Thursday June 01, 2017 @01:51AM
(#14458279)
I've remembered remembering things before. It's often been useful, especially when I forget the thing I remembered.
Re:Interleaving and varying your study location are good lea...
by kqr on Thursday June 01, 2017 @02:26AM
(#14458376)
I don't find it entirely implausible. Think of it like bloom filters or floating point numbers; the more you need to store and recall, the less accurate it will be.
Its not like there's an "erase" routine in our brains, it's just that the neural pathways start getting used more and more for other more important things. But there's still a readable trace of the old pathway there.
Sort of like the shortcut over the corner of the lawn where the grass can't grow because everyone goes there, but then when the new overpass is built people stop going there and new grass sort of grows over it but not completely because other people see the desire path and use it for other purposes every now and then so it never really disappears.
Or does he mean effectively unlimited, like a brain having 1000 YB[0] of storage and a human never coming close to experiencing that much information input in their lifetime?
[0] This number is made up and for illustrative purposes.