Don't all corporate punishments include the clause "up to and including termination"?

If the court is compelling Uber to produce documents and/or information, and if those documents/information are in the hands on one employee, then the courts are compelling Uber to compel employee. That's Uber's card to play, "punishment, up to and including termination".

The court didn't order Uber to fire Levandowski, it ask Uber to do everything within its power to produce documents/information.