Your argument is that we focus on issues that are solvable today. I don't think that refraining from instructing an AC-130 operator to fire upon a hospital operated by Doctors without Borders is a change that requires more than a day of thought. Doing reconnaissance and reviewing intel before striking a civilian target probably doesn't take the world's most advanced fighting force more than a few hours.

There are already rules against it. Please read the Geneva Convention.

During war there are all kinds of accidents, bad judgment, etc. Friendly fire, for example, is a major cause of death.

Now how about the hundreds of people who have died while we were having this conversation?

I don't understand the point you are trying to make. I'm more than happy to continue this conversation with you but I would have to ask that you present your argument again.

About a war crime in my opinion.