News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IPhone =/= Debian app by zaphar on Friday June 18, 2010 @10:22PM (#1444002)
I don't think he missed your point at all. Would you say that GCC as one of the debian apps others here have mentioned was less successful?

It arguably helps power Facebook, Ebay, Google, Amazon,... and any number of other of those sites you mentioned. Or perhaps Python? is it less successful?

Or perhaps you defined successful in terms of revenue only? In which case that's a very narrowly defined term and the case could be made that such a narrowly defined definition of success adds "zero additional value" to the conversation.

Re:IPhone =/= Debian app by einarvollset on Saturday June 19, 2010 @01:51AM (#1444213)
Dude that makes no sense, sorry. Re-read my comment; my point is: high number of apps does not correlate negatively with importance of platform or value of whatever is created on that platform.
Re:IPhone =/= Debian app by pyre on Saturday June 19, 2010 @02:40AM (#1444267)
But it doesn't correlate positively either. The 'article' is in response to someone claiming that having X apps created in Y years obviously means that a platform is 'more quality' than another, which is rubbish logic.
Re:IPhone =/= Debian app by einarvollset on Saturday June 19, 2010 @08:47PM (#1445609)
I respectfully disagree.