News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gollvm from Google by weberc2 on Saturday May 27, 2017 @10:16PM (#14432841)
I don't disagree, but this is a different problem than the one cited above.
Re:Gollvm from Google by zeusk on Sunday May 28, 2017 @11:03AM (#14434628)
well, it is - because the existing architectural backends for llvm ir won't work with go's ir.
Re:Gollvm from Google by weberc2 on Sunday May 28, 2017 @03:12PM (#14435663)
The cited problem was abstracting over different architectures. Go's IR solves this problem already. Solving this problem has nothing to do with making LLVM IR and Go's IR interoperable. A related problem might be that Go's IR doesn't target as many platforms as LLVM's, but that's still a different problem.