News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Teachers must ditch 'neuromyth' of learning styles, say s... by andrewflnr on Friday May 26, 2017 @03:58PM (#14426721)
And yet, I continue to see anecdotal evidence that something like learning styles do exist. Granted, they don't always fit the classic visual/kinesthetic/auditory classification. For instance, I often learn a new topic best by reading about it, while some friends do better watching videos. And I think we all know that different explanations on hard topics work for different people.

Other people here have talked about stupid things people have done because of a simplistic understanding of learning styles. Ok, fine. Obviously you need to learn a topic in its own medium, and there's limits to what you can teach with song and dance. But let's do enough experiments to actually figure out what's going on, and not throw the baby out with the bathwater. There's clearly something there, IMO, even if it's relatively insignificant.

Re:Teachers must ditch 'neuromyth' of learning styles, say s... by karlkatzke on Friday May 26, 2017 @04:06PM (#14426769)
I think it's more appropriate to say that some people have deficits in taking in information in particular ways. Someone with an auditory processing disorder will not retain spoken information, for instance.

What bugs me about the OP article is that they pan "learning styles" consistently without saying what should be used instead, and I have to assume that the instead is something that only makes sense to neuroscientists and looks a lot like "learning styles" if you explain it to a layman.