News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sublime Text 3 Build 3132 released by coldtea on Friday May 26, 2017 @10:49AM (#14424427)
>I understand people who need/want it because it's snappier and handles large files great. I am however not really one of those people.

If ST3 had the same features (basically, more support for friendlier plugin integration) it would totally devastate those, apart from in price (which should be irrelevant for professional developers anyway).

But even as it is now, it's way handier (due to the snappiness) for everyday coding than VS Code (Atom is so slow it doesn't even qualify).

Re:Sublime Text 3 Build 3132 released by themoat on Friday May 26, 2017 @11:36AM (#14424785)
I read about atom's github integration that they released last week and I've been playing with Atom at work this week.

How big is your project that you find atom slow? I have gone back and forth between atom and sublime 10 times in the last 10 minutes and I have not found a single reason why anyone would notice a lag in a project of just a shade over 10,000 files. The difference in speed is completely imperceptible.

Not saying I love atom more than any other editor (I typically use terminal vim) but in my experience over the last week, any complaints about atom's sluggishness seems either outdated or wrong to the point of absurdity.

Re:Sublime Text 3 Build 3132 released by apocalyptic0n3 on Friday May 26, 2017 @09:18PM (#14428390)
I haven't given Atom a good chance since the beginning of the year, but startup was noticeably slower for me. I often use it to read/modify extremely large JSON files (tens of thousands of lines) and Atom struggled to render that. I also frequently have dozens of tabs open and Atom seemed to slow down with that many open. I've had 50+ open in Sublime before with no issue.

All that said, Sublime is not my daily driver. I use JetBrains products for that. I mostly use it to jot down notes that will eventually be transferred somewhere more permanent, temp access tokens for APIs, small snippets, JSON files, Mardown files, etc. If my main use with ST3 wasn't frequently opening and closing it, relying on its great performance when opened with my actual IDE(s), and abusing its second-to-none ability to keep files saved without actually saving them to disk, I may feel differently.

Re:Sublime Text 3 Build 3132 released by konart on Friday May 26, 2017 @12:30PM (#14425250)
>How big is your project

Different guy here, but I don't thing project size has much to do with it. For me it's UI for the most part. Most of the time I can see, how the moment text goes from "simple text" to the "highlighed text" (and all of the formatting too). I simply can't stand this. Same happens when searching a large file (I do work with logs pretty often). But this problem is solved in Atom for the most part - you still can't open files larger than 10Mb...

And as a separate issue - the latest update made it impossible to update Packages for some reason. All I'm getting is "undefined" error.

Re:Sublime Text 3 Build 3132 released by aditya42 on Friday May 26, 2017 @12:43PM (#14425374)
deleting seti-ui and seti-syntax will fix the problem of not being able to update packages[1]

[1]: https://github.com/atom/apm/issues/620

Re:Sublime Text 3 Build 3132 released by konart on Saturday May 27, 2017 @01:59AM (#14429101)
facepalm. really.

Thank you, random citizen.

Re:Sublime Text 3 Build 3132 released by coldtea on Friday May 26, 2017 @12:52PM (#14425448)
>The difference in speed is completely imperceptible.

It's perceptible to me, even in VSC (which runs circles around Atom).