Re:The largest Git repo
by cryptonector on Wednesday May 24, 2017 @08:45PM
(#14414580)
Most changes don't touch hundreds/thousands of files. If you were to split the repo into many (as Windows used to be) then you'd still have the problem of huge projects having MANY conflicts, but worse: now you need to do your merge/rebase for each such repo.
In any case, rebasing is better than merging. (Rebasing is a series of merges, naturally, but still.)
In any case, rebasing is better than merging. (Rebasing is a series of merges, naturally, but still.)