Re:The largest Git repo
by pvg on Wednesday May 24, 2017 @03:20PM
(#14412707)
It's very much really. The fact that it's easier doesn't really matter - a repo is about access to the source code and its history with some degree of convenience. The process and policy of how you control actual change is quite orthogonal. You can have a single repo and enforce inter-module interfaces very strongly. You can have 20 repos and not enforce them at all. Same goes for builds, tests, history, etc. The underlying technology can influence the process but it doesn't make it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.