News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:At Google, an Employee-Run Email List Tracks Harassment a... by refurb on Tuesday May 23, 2017 @10:35AM (#14401542)
Is it?

As long as the performance review was done based on the employee's performance over the entire year, it's fair game no?

I'm not sure I agree with the logic that someone who takes time off during the year is given credit for the good work they would have done had they not taken time off.

Re:At Google, an Employee-Run Email List Tracks Harassment a... by wcummings on Tuesday May 23, 2017 @10:52AM (#14401709)
The logic is that you aren't expected to work in your off time so it shouldn't factor in at all. If his work exceeded during the time he was working whether or not he took leave shouldn't effect that.

Reviews should be about the quality of the work, not whether you take 0 vacations days or work until 10pm everyday because you're 22 and don't have a family.

Re:At Google, an Employee-Run Email List Tracks Harassment a... by sidlls on Tuesday May 23, 2017 @11:02AM (#14401804)
Consider it as a ratio WQ:T where "WQ" is the Work x Quality product and T is the Time of employment. You're saying that T should be a constant and include time an employee isn't expected to be working, but WQ is fair to vary. Essentially you're adding to T even when the employee is expected explicitly to not add to WQ.

So in my opinion it's not fair game.