Re:Scientists find 7.2M-year-old pre-human remains in the Ba...
by valuearb on Tuesday May 23, 2017 @02:06PM
(#14403602)
They weren't skeletons of "modern-ish" humans, they were primitive hominin, i.e. a group that includes Chimps, humans, and Australopithecus.
Re:Scientists find 7.2M-year-old pre-human remains in the Ba...
by insulanian on Tuesday May 23, 2017 @02:08AM
(#14399152)
> They know because the teeth of the skeletons have a specific thing that the teeth of humans have but not the teeth of other primates.
What is the "specific thing"?
Re:Scientists find 7.2M-year-old pre-human remains in the Ba...
by metafunctor on Tuesday May 23, 2017 @03:17AM
(#14399445)
I don't care to explain like to a five year old, but the authors of the paper propose that only the modern human lineage have a total of four premolars in the lower jaw with a single root each. They claim these were never present in other hominid species.
Re:Scientists find 7.2M-year-old pre-human remains in the Ba...
by weavie on Tuesday May 23, 2017 @06:04AM
(#14400074)
I was under the impression that it was because humans learned to control fire, meaning we could eat softer food which altered the human teeth. However, 7.2m years massively predates our current understanding of when fire was first utilised..
The older skeleton is 1 million years older than old skeletons found in Africa. So now the oldest skeletons that we know about come from Europe not Africa, raising the possibility that humans evolved in Europe.