Why one search engine for the whole internet is not a good idea anymore

Re:Why one search engine for the whole internet is not a goo... by golergka on Thursday May 18, 2017 @02:49AM (#14365296)

Just like Facebook's AI is solving the feed problem? Do you trust the proprietary machine learning black box, that even the creators don't completely understand, ran by a for-profit corporation to decide what information you consume?

It's not like I have a better suggestion, but AI is definitely not a silver bullet for this.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why one search engine for the whole internet is not a goo... by ojosilva on Thursday May 18, 2017 @04:54AM (#14365760)

I wasn't think corporate AI actually. Something between Wikipedia not-for-profit wikipedians and personal AI (browser or independently managed). AI is definitely not a silver bullet, but algorithm and human-based solutions are out of the question, so AI is probably the best option moving forward.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why one search engine for the whole internet is not a goo... by pdimitar on Thursday May 18, 2017 @08:24AM (#14366610)

Facebook's so-called "AI algorithms" only optimize for advertisement money, not for good feed experience. Hardly a good example.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why one search engine for the whole internet is not a goo... by golergka on Thursday May 18, 2017 @10:51AM (#14367683)

If you're worried about ad money in a scope of 10 next years, one will be related to the other.

[ Parent | on HN ]