News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why one search engine for the whole internet is not a goo... by ojosilva on Thursday May 18, 2017 @02:25AM (#14365200)
That's a problem now only AI could solve. All other attempts at non-AI algorithms are futile. We need to be able to search through a curated internet that looks somewhat like a mix of Wikipedia and the old Yahoo directory and has to be tailored to each individual user search goals (I unlike you may be interested in commercial workout products). AI is the only "curator" capable of ranking and selecting results with such abstract filters.
Re:Why one search engine for the whole internet is not a goo... by golergka on Thursday May 18, 2017 @02:49AM (#14365296)
Just like Facebook's AI is solving the feed problem? Do you trust the proprietary machine learning black box, that even the creators don't completely understand, ran by a for-profit corporation to decide what information you consume?

It's not like I have a better suggestion, but AI is definitely not a silver bullet for this.

Re:Why one search engine for the whole internet is not a goo... by ojosilva on Thursday May 18, 2017 @04:54AM (#14365760)
I wasn't think corporate AI actually. Something between Wikipedia not-for-profit wikipedians and personal AI (browser or independently managed). AI is definitely not a silver bullet, but algorithm and human-based solutions are out of the question, so AI is probably the best option moving forward.
Re:Why one search engine for the whole internet is not a goo... by pdimitar on Thursday May 18, 2017 @08:24AM (#14366610)
Facebook's so-called "AI algorithms" only optimize for advertisement money, not for good feed experience. Hardly a good example.
Re:Why one search engine for the whole internet is not a goo... by golergka on Thursday May 18, 2017 @10:51AM (#14367683)
If you're worried about ad money in a scope of 10 next years, one will be related to the other.