News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Chelsea Manning, who gave trove of U.S. secrets to Wikileaks, to leave prison. Parent comment

Re:Chelsea Manning, who gave trove of U.S. secrets to Wikile... by dagw on Wednesday May 17, 2017 @08:42AM (#14357827)
Wasn't that the WSJ?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Chelsea Manning, who gave trove of U.S. secrets to Wikile... by pharrlax on Wednesday May 17, 2017 @08:48AM (#14357873)
Started with WSJ but lots of other outlets pitched in.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Chelsea Manning, who gave trove of U.S. secrets to Wikile... by dagw on Wednesday May 17, 2017 @08:58AM (#14357943)
But if you're going to boycott someone over something shouldn't you boycott the entity responsible?

From what I can find WaPo reported what WSJ wrote and then gave plenty of space to Kjellberg and his side of the story.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Chelsea Manning, who gave trove of U.S. secrets to Wikile... by cholantesh on Wednesday May 17, 2017 @10:05AM (#14358511)
More accurate to say that it was first reported by the WSJ and picked up by other outlets based on their reputation as a paper of record [1]. Whether this perception is merited, or if the concept is (still) relevant is another conversation.

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newspaper_of_record

[ Parent | on HN ]