Two years of Rust

Re:Two years of Rust by jadbox on Monday May 15, 2017 @10:31PM (#14346959)

Tokio feels like something that needs its own funding and dedicated team... it feels like its development has been slower than what you would expect of a critical (to me) tool for elegantly handling async connections, which is particularly important for web servers.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Two years of Rust by im_down_w_otp on Tuesday May 16, 2017 @12:19AM (#14347324)

I'll happily fund one person full-time to work on that, but you'll have to convince the primary author to go for it :-)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Two years of Rust by erickt on Tuesday May 16, 2017 @12:48AM (#14347432)

Hello! Rust core and community team member here. If you (or anyone else) are serious about trying to fund development of Tokio, please send us an email at [email protected] and we would happily connect you to people working on the project.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Two years of Rust by carllerche on Tuesday May 16, 2017 @02:04AM (#14347679)

I'm curious what gives you that impression. What do you think is missing or should be tackled sooner than later? There has been a lot of evolution, however it has all been done in backwards compatible ways so there has not yet been a need to bump the version. It's also spread out across a number of crates.

[ Parent | on HN ]