News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Global ‘Wana’ Ransomware Outbreak Earned Perpetrators $26... by mootothemax on Monday May 15, 2017 @03:00PM (#14344169)
Would they make more money if they demanded $10 instead of $300? While $300 isn't crazy money, it's more than enough to be painful, and definitely feels like ransom.

I wonder how many people facing a locked computer would sigh, say a few choice swearwords, and dig out their cards had it been a relatively low amount.

Re:Global ‘Wana’ Ransomware Outbreak Earned Perpetrators $26... by vec on Monday May 15, 2017 @03:08PM (#14344228)
Asking to get paid in Bitcoin is already a stiff barrier to entry for most users, so probably not. $300 feels close to the upper threshold where people who already care enough to not balk at the Bitcoin requirement also won't balk at the sticker price.
Re:Global ‘Wana’ Ransomware Outbreak Earned Perpetrators $26... by mootothemax on Monday May 15, 2017 @03:11PM (#14344258)
Ahh, yeah you're totally right, I keep forgetting that the victims need to pay with bitcoin.

Well. I guess it's good that there's not a more convenient way to give in to the criminals' demands!

Re:Global ‘Wana’ Ransomware Outbreak Earned Perpetrators $26... by paulgb on Monday May 15, 2017 @03:35PM (#14344432)
They passed up a good opportunity for price discovery: have the ransomware pick a random number between, say, 10 and 1000 and learn from that for future attacks.
Re:Global ‘Wana’ Ransomware Outbreak Earned Perpetrators $26... by occamrazor on Monday May 15, 2017 @03:48PM (#14344548)
Other ramsomware authors did this. I remember reading that the optimal​ amount is somewhere between 300 and 500$, but i can't find a source anymore.
Re:Global ‘Wana’ Ransomware Outbreak Earned Perpetrators $26... by DenisM on Monday May 15, 2017 @03:46PM (#14344526)
They could also make a machine learning model to take into account the part of the world, the hardware model, and other wealth indicators.
Re:Global ‘Wana’ Ransomware Outbreak Earned Perpetrators $26... by tyingq on Monday May 15, 2017 @03:23PM (#14344349)
They probably would have made more by being quiet about the infection and renting it out as a botnet, or selling whatever interesting data they found.