News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Rejection Letter by iiv on Saturday May 13, 2017 @11:06AM (#14331325)
I usually like satire, but this felt too obvious. Subtlety is in my opinion a key part of good satire. Otherwise it feels too forced or too in-your-face.

But as the specialist external reader said: "Stross can clearly write workmanlike, commercial prose". I can definitely agree with that!

Re:Rejection Letter by kbenson on Saturday May 13, 2017 @11:32PM (#14334081)
How do you satirize something subtly when the point is that real life is so outrageous that it beggars belief?

I like subtle satire too, but that doesn't mean it works in every instance.

Re:Rejection Letter by pleboidal on Sunday May 14, 2017 @12:32AM (#14334235)
Interesting, though, that the concepts expressed in this narrative, had they been written in 2010, and promptly rejected, might have provided all the more grist for the paranoia mill.