Re:Waymo’s lawsuit against Uber is going to trial, judge rules
by amyjess on Friday May 12, 2017 @11:24AM
(#14324800)
My guess is corporate espionage. For them to get an injunction like this, they probably paid members of the engineering team to give them proprietary information.
Re:Waymo’s lawsuit against Uber is going to trial, judge rules
by FireBeyond on Friday May 12, 2017 @01:27PM
(#14325907)
You're going to have a hard time proving it was done properly, clean room, etc, when one of the heads of your department on the topic was a key engineer of the technology you are supposedly reverse engineering when he worked on it at the competitor who developed it.
Re:Waymo’s lawsuit against Uber is going to trial, judge rules
by woodandsteel on Friday May 12, 2017 @04:33PM
(#14327664)
I guess Uber wants us to believe that Lewandowski downloaded the files for some other purpose than using the information in the job he was going to start in a few days.
Re:Waymo’s lawsuit against Uber is going to trial, judge rules
by bobsil1 on Friday May 12, 2017 @05:47PM
(#14328207)
Flip side, he can't be barred from using his skills as long as you document clean room procedures.
Re:Waymo’s lawsuit against Uber is going to trial, judge rules
by linkregister on Friday May 12, 2017 @01:53PM
(#14326165)
Thanks, I have a knee-jerk reaction to "reverse engineering is illegal / a tort" statements without nuance.
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_room_design