Re:A crashed advertisement reveals logs of a facial recognit...
by TeMPOraL on Thursday May 11, 2017 @07:12AM
(#14315191)
Me neither (too lazy for that), but I know they are used and abused by people too. This leads to funny cases I heard of like a company specifying that some shoes are for "walking", not for "running", and refusing to refund them if you admit to running in them.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A crashed advertisement reveals logs of a facial recognit...
by kebman on Thursday May 11, 2017 @07:56AM
(#14315349)
You guys need Norwegian consumer protection...
Re:A crashed advertisement reveals logs of a facial recognit...
by vsl on Friday May 12, 2017 @05:37AM
(#14322550)
As long as it comes bundled with Norwegian famously cruel child "protection" services, thanks but no thanks.
Re:A crashed advertisement reveals logs of a facial recognit...
by mason240 on Thursday May 11, 2017 @08:41AM
(#14315556)
That doesn't sound too unreasonable. Some shoes like heels are made for fashion, not function.
Re:A crashed advertisement reveals logs of a facial recognit...
by bigiain on Thursday May 11, 2017 @08:20PM
(#14320567)
If it's "not unreasonable" for them to reject warranty claims if you run in shoes "not intended for running", does that mean it is reasonable to make a warranty claim on shoes "intended for fashion" if you're not picked up while wearing them?
"Wore these heels to six bars, didn't get hit on once. Please repair or refund."