News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What's Reasonable to Qualcomm Isn't to Apple by madeofpalk on Tuesday May 09, 2017 @09:45PM (#14305330)
These are all FRAND patents that the dispute is over. In short, Apple is claiming that they aren't priced reasonably, which is a reasonable claim to make.

Why should Apple pay Qualcomm more for a radio in a 128GB iPhone than a 32GB iPhone?

Re:What's Reasonable to Qualcomm Isn't to Apple by gcb0 on Thursday May 11, 2017 @03:08AM (#14314311)
because the royalties are proportional to the profit. since the patent claim is the profits wouldnt exist without the original work. it's just like tax works. a judge cannot declare that illegal without criticizing all of tax law.