Re:The new ASP.NET Core 2.0 packages can no longer be used o...
by DougN7 on Tuesday May 09, 2017 @07:52AM
(#14299206)
Remember, these are the people that came up with the System32 folder for 64-bit files, and SysWow64 for 32-bit files.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The new ASP.NET Core 2.0 packages can no longer be used o...
by piaste on Tuesday May 09, 2017 @08:05AM
(#14299274)
It's properly named, because you say "wow..." when you figure it out.
Re:The new ASP.NET Core 2.0 packages can no longer be used o...
by JBiserkov on Tuesday May 09, 2017 @09:32AM
(#14299809)
It's actually an acronym for "Windows On Windows", but I like your take too :)
Re:The new ASP.NET Core 2.0 packages can no longer be used o...
by gmiller123456 on Tuesday May 09, 2017 @04:10PM
(#14303412)
While I hate to interfere with any Microsoft bashing, the use of system32 is actually because too many 3rd party apps didn't bother calling "GetSystemDirectory()" and just assumed it was system32. And Wow64 is Windows On Windows 64, a subsystem for making non 64 bit apps run on 64 bit Windows. So that one will remain properly named until SysWow128 comes about.
Re:The new ASP.NET Core 2.0 packages can no longer be used o...
by DougN7 on Tuesday May 09, 2017 @04:44PM
(#14303646)
Sure, there is a valid reason (it's not like they got drunk and made this all up). But the result is completely backwards from what everyone would expect it to mean. They might as well have named it FHJAL3481JF because at least it means nothing, instead of the opposite of what everyone expects. Sys32OnWin64 might have been a better choice.
Re:The new ASP.NET Core 2.0 packages can no longer be used o...
by gmiller123456 on Wednesday May 10, 2017 @12:42PM
(#14309583)
It isn't a valid assumption (nor expectation) that MS would design it so that anyone not skilled in Windows development would understand it. If you want to see a nightmare, look at a *nix file system. If it were a contest, I'm sure most people would give the point to Microsoft on this one.