News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Berkshire Hathaway Code of Business Conduct and Ethics [pdf] by fiftyacorn on Monday May 08, 2017 @02:41PM (#14294338)
would be interesting to see it broken down by company
Re:Berkshire Hathaway Code of Business Conduct and Ethics [pdf] by dharmon on Monday May 08, 2017 @05:53PM (#14295971)
I wonder how many are pissed off NetJet union members?*

*NetJet (a Berkshire subsidiary) has been in a labor battle, with employees outside protesting the meeting this past weekend.

Re:Berkshire Hathaway Code of Business Conduct and Ethics [pdf] by tanderson92 on Monday May 08, 2017 @06:28PM (#14296218)
Why do you describe them as pissed off? Simply because they use their rights to battle for better working benefits? This snide characterization of unionized labor undermines all workers' efforts at fair compensation.
Re:Berkshire Hathaway Code of Business Conduct and Ethics [pdf] by dharmon on Monday May 08, 2017 @08:16PM (#14296736)
Calling someone "pissed off" makes no value judgment about them being right or wrong, it just describes their emotional state.

I would describe the citizens of Flint, MI as "pissed off", and rightly so. Would you say that description is undermining their efforts to right past wrongs?

If I were you I would hesitate to make such hasty accusations.

Re:Berkshire Hathaway Code of Business Conduct and Ethics [pdf] by wmeredith on Monday May 08, 2017 @09:49PM (#14297173)
Eh, maybe, maybe not. Language is powerful. Replaced the "pissed off" descriptor in that sentence with "shafted" or "fucked over" and it dramatically shifts the narrative.
Re:Berkshire Hathaway Code of Business Conduct and Ethics [pdf] by TheSpiceIsLife on Monday May 08, 2017 @10:49PM (#14297394)
That may be so, but the words used were "pissed off" and not any of the wildly different examples you've provided which dramatically change the narrative.
Re:Berkshire Hathaway Code of Business Conduct and Ethics [pdf] by tanderson92 on Tuesday May 09, 2017 @12:39AM (#14297772)
That's the point. The ones he provided indicate the workers have merit while pissed off is quite close to disgruntled.
Re:Berkshire Hathaway Code of Business Conduct and Ethics [pdf] by tanderson92 on Monday May 08, 2017 @08:35PM (#14296831)
Even describing the employees' emotional state is unfair to labor, as emotions may not have entered into the decision to protest and emotions are perceived to be less important than cold business logic. Thee workers may need the benefits to survive in their community. When an employer cuts wages or hours or jobs, they say that there are no emotions involved, it's just business.

If I were you I would be more careful with the connotations of the language you choose, being mindful of how it is likely to be perceived.

Re:Berkshire Hathaway Code of Business Conduct and Ethics [pdf] by duncan_bayne on Monday May 08, 2017 @06:57PM (#14296387)
Anecdata for sure, but it's been a reasonable characterisation of the Unions I've seen. The public sector and construction Unions here are notably corrupt.
Re:Berkshire Hathaway Code of Business Conduct and Ethics [pdf] by hackuser on Monday May 08, 2017 @07:07PM (#14296435)
> notably corrupt

What about their employers?

I think unions are painted with a very broad stereotype by people who don't know them (including most people on HN, I would guess) and held to different standards than businesses, many of whom are notably corrupt.