News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Net neutrality is in jeopardy again by sqeaky on Monday May 08, 2017 @11:46AM (#14292595)
It doesn't, but the ISP still know what pages you went to.

If they want to determine your political leanings your browsing history is enough.

Re:Net neutrality is in jeopardy again by manigandham on Monday May 08, 2017 @12:12PM (#14292892)
How would the ISP know what pages you went to over HTTPS? Only the domain name would be available, through SNI/DNS.
Re:Net neutrality is in jeopardy again by rocqua on Monday May 08, 2017 @12:29PM (#14293083)
They could just MITM all connections and say 'for compatibility reasons, please install this root certificate'.

With a fee, this requirement could then be waived.

Dystopian but technically possible.

Re:Net neutrality is in jeopardy again by narrowrail on Monday May 08, 2017 @01:58PM (#14293960)
This type of hypothetical drives me batty, and I was tempted to be snarky. I'm not sure how to respond to the idea that there will ever be a time your ISP requires root cert installation for service, but I will be finding a way to launch a WISP of my own at that point.
Re:Net neutrality is in jeopardy again by pdkl95 on Monday May 08, 2017 @02:40PM (#14294326)
It's only slightly hypothetical.

http://www.csoonline.com/article/2865806/cloud-security/gogo...

Gogo didn't require installing a root cert, but they DID issue forged certificates to MitM connections to *.google.com (and others).

Also, remember "Superfish"? Their root cert was pre-installed by Lenovo.

Re:Net neutrality is in jeopardy again by rocqua on Monday May 08, 2017 @02:25PM (#14294218)
My original was already snark. Though I don't think its impossible that a small amount of non-technical people might actually be convinced to do this.
Re:Net neutrality is in jeopardy again by ufo on Monday May 08, 2017 @06:33PM (#14296253)
Just the domain names is already a lot of information...