Re:For Chinese Home Buyers, Seattle Is the New Vancouver
by eigenvector on Monday May 08, 2017 @03:00AM
(#14289772)
This was an actual thing that existed in the UK before the secret ballot and other democratic reforms, when you could effectively own an entire electoral district. They were called "pocket boroughs", i.e. they were in a patron's pocket.
Re:For Chinese Home Buyers, Seattle Is the New Vancouver
by harikb on Monday May 08, 2017 @03:02AM
(#14289777)
This is far too expensive though. It is much cheaper to influence public with fabricated issues about candidates you don't like. May be 1/100th of your estimate.
Re:For Chinese Home Buyers, Seattle Is the New Vancouver
by MagnumOpus on Monday May 08, 2017 @04:53AM
(#14290144)
> elections in lot of developed countries often decided by thin margins from very predictable geographical locations
Actually only in the US and UK. Most other developed countries have evolved beyond the "first past the post" system.
Re:For Chinese Home Buyers, Seattle Is the New Vancouver
by wmeredith on Monday May 08, 2017 @10:19PM
(#14297285)
Eh, why bother with the Lex Luther routine when you can just buy congressman for $140k apiece(0)? It's cheaper and easier.
0 - http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2017/03/vote-correlation-int...
Edit: Added a source.
Re:For Chinese Home Buyers, Seattle Is the New Vancouver
by maxerickson on Monday May 08, 2017 @09:06AM
(#14291126)
Controlling counties doesn't do anything for you at the national level; you need to reliably control swing states. And if you want to actually control things, you need a great deal of influence over ~10 of them, because the deciding states for a given national issue/election tend to vary.
Re:For Chinese Home Buyers, Seattle Is the New Vancouver
by owebmaster on Monday May 08, 2017 @09:23AM
(#14291217)
> Imagine what kind of havoke a foreign government can create if they buy up all aggreculture land and control food prices in peace times and famines in war times
They would also have to invade this country or corrupt the government.
In theory, foreign power with deep pockets can buy up large swaths of important land and establish local governments and population that eventually can tilt national politics and policies in desired way. This becomes more and more easier as elections in lot of developed countries often decided by thin margins from very predictable geographical locations. I am not saying this is happening but at least in theory it's possible to design full on economic attack on any country with such laws. Imagine what kind of havoke a foreign government can create if they buy up all aggreculture land and control food prices in peace times and famines in war times. Or buy up key commercial estates critical to producing energy or real estate for even just simple daily needs like gas stations or grocery stores.