Re:Pure CSS Twitter Fail Whale
by thwarted on Sunday June 13, 2010 @11:26PM
(#1428769)
You mean fewer HTTP requests. The CSS is entirely in the document. So unless you base64 encode the failwhale image and put it in a data: url in an img tag, it's one less request compared to an HTML page containing a single image.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Pure CSS Twitter Fail Whale
by kwamenum86 on Monday June 14, 2010 @12:15PM
(#1430067)
By that logic it is the same number of HTTP requests. Embedding images in the document is trivial at this point.