News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber faces criminal probe over software used to evade aut... by kartickv on Friday May 05, 2017 @03:38AM (#14271759)
Why is it okay for the owner to do this, but not an employee? Why is it okay if you have just one shop rather than a chain?
Re:Uber faces criminal probe over software used to evade aut... by ingenuous2 on Friday May 05, 2017 @03:47AM (#14271789)
For the latter, because that indicates a criminal enterprise. The idea of a coordinated group of people all breaking the law is deemed worse than one individual.

I can reconcile this with my own values.

Practically, an enterprise of criminals is more likely to be effective, and thus would create more negative costs.

Legally, it allows prosecution of the organizers of a crime group, who are likely the most dangerous and more difficult to catch in the act, as they contract others to do their work.

Re:Uber faces criminal probe over software used to evade aut... by NumberCruncher on Friday May 05, 2017 @05:26AM (#14272150)
I am not a lawyer but in jurisdiction there may be a slight difference between crime and organized crime like between selling drugs on the street and leading a drug smuggling cartel. And training your employees how to break law could be also prosecuted.
Re:Uber faces criminal probe over software used to evade aut... by avar on Friday May 05, 2017 @03:53AM (#14271809)
Uber is being tried federally because their crimes cross state lines, which wouldn't be the case with one pizza parlor operating locally in one state engaging in the same behavior.
Re:Uber faces criminal probe over software used to evade aut... by underdown on Friday May 05, 2017 @12:36PM (#14274719)
Uber is the subject of a federal criminal probe to see if they have committed crimes. Lets not get ahead of ourselves.