News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber faces criminal probe over software used to evade aut... by dragonwriter on Thursday May 04, 2017 @07:55PM (#14269980)
> I'm not a fan of Uber, but it seems like it's their right to decide who is allowed to use their service.

It's not their right to operate where they are prohibited, and it's also not their right to feed people believed to be enforcing that prohibition false information to prevent themselves from being busted for violating that prohibition.

Re:Uber faces criminal probe over software used to evade aut... by nostromo on Thursday May 04, 2017 @08:02PM (#14270023)
We have a tool for this -- the government asks for a subpoena from a judge to force Uber to provide their data. It's all out in the open and Uber can argue against the subpoena if they choose.

Scraping APIs with fake profiles isn't the right way to go about this.

Re:Uber faces criminal probe over software used to evade aut... by j2kun on Thursday May 04, 2017 @08:07PM (#14270050)
I was under the impression it's illegal to intentionally mislead any federal employee, subpoena or not, in any communication whatsoever. Whether it's the "right" way or not, it seems like an API counts as a form of communication.
Re:Uber faces criminal probe over software used to evade aut... by philip1209 on Thursday May 04, 2017 @08:15PM (#14270099)
State laws are not enforced by federal officials though, correct?
Re:Uber faces criminal probe over software used to evade aut... by openasocket on Thursday May 04, 2017 @08:23PM (#14270155)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corru...

RICO gives federal jurisdiction over cases of interstate entities committing obstruction of justice.

Re:Uber faces criminal probe over software used to evade aut... by sandworm101 on Thursday May 04, 2017 @08:20PM (#14270132)
No, but they can investigate where there is the possibility of conspiracies. Basically everything Uber does involves the flow of data across state lines and the feds can investigate otherwise state crimes that cross multiple states. This is what Uber needs to really worry about:

"If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both."

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/371

Re:Uber faces criminal probe over software used to evade aut... by geofft on Thursday May 04, 2017 @10:33PM (#14270724)
A subpoena is one investigative tool. It is not the only investigative tool, and it's often not the best one.

If a law enforcement agency wants to catch child predators, it is entirely legitimate for them to make fake profiles of children and see who responds, and it's going to be a lot more productive than sending subpoenas to the creepiest-looking people in town saying "Are you a child predator Y/N".

Re:Uber faces criminal probe over software used to evade aut... by verbify on Thursday May 04, 2017 @08:09PM (#14270069)
A subpoena is not the only way the government collects evidence of wrongdoing.
Re:Uber faces criminal probe over software used to evade aut... by SilasX on Thursday May 04, 2017 @08:41PM (#14270254)
I assume this is a hedge against being fed fake data.
Re:Uber faces criminal probe over software used to evade aut... by stock_toaster on Thursday May 04, 2017 @08:00PM (#14270008)
Maybe also a conspiracy charge as Uber was actively/knowingly helping drivers (who are not technically Uber employees, right?) break laws in cities by providing them a means to evade authorities?