It may be there, but in what quantity? Please don't imply all countries are equally safe.

And why should fear be the only cause to bar entry? Is that the standard you'd use for your home? I'd start with close friends and family, myself, then go from there.

> Is that the standard you'd use for your home?

One doesn't (and shouldn't) run a country like a house.

Do not confuse a house with a home. After all, you have a homeland, not a houseland.

I'm not interested in semantic gotcha games.

You get to limit your house to friends and family. Have at it.

You don't get to limit your country to that. Hell, you don't even get to limit your property to that, if you've got a sidewalk on it.

The difference between a house and a home is much more than semantics.

And much how the members of a household influence who to let in, the citizens of a country decide that as well, via voting.

Or do you consider yourself a higher authority on what they 'get' to decide on?

Our system, at times, doesn't let us vote to impede human rights. Gay marriage is now the law of the land, because the Supreme Court deemed there to be a right to it despite legislative efforts. The right to a fair trial isn't always popular, but we don't get to vote on it. The right of the KKK to march and speak isn't popular, but we don't get to vote on it.

Same with immigration - courts have blocked plenty of enforcement measures and violations of human rights like long-term detention of children. There's a reason "majority rules" isn't the only way we do things in the US and most other democracies.