Re:Mini.css – Minimal, responsive, style-agnostic CSS framework
by taormina on Thursday May 04, 2017 @09:30AM
(#14264630)
Should they always have to?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Mini.css – Minimal, responsive, style-agnostic CSS framework
by vinceguidry on Thursday May 04, 2017 @09:46AM
(#14264754)
No, and that's what I was asking. Have we reached the point where we can ignore IE?
Re:Mini.css – Minimal, responsive, style-agnostic CSS framework
by bpicolo on Thursday May 04, 2017 @10:20AM
(#14264993)
IE8/9/10 for most purposes, yep. IE11, no (IE11 is used more than Edge as far as I've seen)
Re:Mini.css – Minimal, responsive, style-agnostic CSS framework
by vinceguidry on Thursday May 04, 2017 @01:09PM
(#14266625)
Which means the answer is no, we can't ignore IE yet and that means I won't be touching this library with a 10 foot pole.
Re:Mini.css – Minimal, responsive, style-agnostic CSS framework
by eli on Thursday May 04, 2017 @09:42AM
(#14264723)
Can they afford to turn away users?
Re:Mini.css – Minimal, responsive, style-agnostic CSS framework
by zoria on Thursday May 04, 2017 @09:44AM
(#14264735)
Maybe not today, but in a few months or a year, possibly. IE is dying and Edge is taking its place. Supporting IE just makes maintanance more difficult, doesn't it?
Re:Mini.css – Minimal, responsive, style-agnostic CSS framework
by USNetizen on Thursday May 04, 2017 @09:48AM
(#14264771)
Not if you want to design a site for any of the millions of government organizations out there who still require support for IE9+