he was warned twice and then got a slap on the wrist after he did it again after saying he wouldn't.

edit: and yes actually, saying you're "an engineer" in an email to the state traffic board _is_ claiming a PE when you don't have one.

has his website changed? It doesn't say professional engineer anywhere on it.

particularly advertisement of services as an expert witness, etc, all are problematic under oregon law. In particular, you cannot be an expert witness without being a PE.

They go into this in the complaint PDF with relevant sections of law, etc.

> They go into this in the complaint PDF with relevant sections of law, etc.

None of the quoted regulations in the complaint mention being an expert witness or even use either of those words.

If the state board has a legitimate complaint about the language used on his web site, they shouldn't undermine their own authority by also bringing up bullshit complaints about doing math without a license. It makes the state board look like they've got a vendetta against the guy.

Which is not what they are complaining about. They are complaining about him presenting himself as an engineer, which is something he did, and shouldn't have done in Oregon. They gave him a warning about it, and he continued doing it. That wasn't smart on his part.